Jump to content

Faeries: Difference between revisions

From SchitzoPunk Wiki
Expanded: the exception in their ethics, and why they take you in
The inherited sentence carries the claim
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
== The exception in their ethics ==
== The exception in their ethics ==


The inherited passage above contains the most important sentence anyone has written about the fey and passes over it in half a line. '''They have a moral order, it is elaborate and sincerely held, and man is the single exception to it.''' {{R|contested}}
The inherited passage carries the load-bearing claim in half a line, and it is worth drawing out. '''They have a moral order, it is elaborate and sincerely held, and man is the single exception to it.''' {{R|contested}}


This is not indifference. Indifference would be simpler and would not require the machinery. They ask forgiveness of a deer. They flagellate over a felled tree. They maintain, by every inherited account, a rigorous and exhausting ethics of consumption toward every living thing in their domain — and none of it extends to a human being, ever, in any account we hold. {{R|inherited}}
This is not indifference. Indifference would be simpler and would not require the machinery. They ask forgiveness of a deer. They flagellate over a felled tree. They maintain, by every inherited account, a rigorous and exhausting ethics of consumption toward every living thing in their domain — and none of it extends to a human being, ever, in any account we hold. {{R|inherited}}
Line 63: Line 63:
| wanted = A firsthand account from anyone. Any account of a fey extending its moral order to a human being, which would break this entry and which we would rather have than be right.
| wanted = A firsthand account from anyone. Any account of a fey extending its moral order to a human being, which would break this entry and which we would rather have than be right.
}}
}}
== See also ==
The fastidiousness about exact terms described above is followed up under [[City of London]], which suggests the instrument may be older than the institutions now running on it.


[[Category:Others]]
[[Category:Others]]
[[Category:Reference entries]]
[[Category:Reference entries]]



Latest revision as of 00:06, 6 September 2026

Faeries
Also calledthe Fey; the Good Neighbours and a hundred other placating names, none of them descriptive
ClassOther — among those that came before man
Dwellsthe deep woods, and other ground man has not taken
Feeds onthe living things of their domain, guiltily; and on man, without guilt
Approachthe trick, or the bargain; rarely possession
Earliest accountEuropean, oral, and old enough that the placating names outlived the accounts
Claimed bythe Golden Dawn and a long tail of others have claimed terms; none has produced them
Consensus among us
Real, territorial, and the only Others we know of with a functioning moral order. That order excludes man completely, and we think we know why.
inherited contested


Those that came before man. Creatures of Nature. Faeries are denizens of the wild, spawned by the life of fauna and flora. They do not distinguish themselves from the rest of the creatures of nature although they are the only ones capable of accessing the Dark. Faeries are able to communicate with all those of nature and feel at home among them. inherited


Faeries, or Fey, have always been agonised by their need to sustain themselves through consuming others. Their culture revolves around self flagellation and forgiveness asked of their surroundings. However this sentiment does not exist towards humans. In the past Fey have feasted on humans regularly and in some cultures have terrorised humans so much that they became local deities that received human sacrifices. inherited


The exception in their ethics

The inherited passage carries the load-bearing claim in half a line, and it is worth drawing out. They have a moral order, it is elaborate and sincerely held, and man is the single exception to it. contested


This is not indifference. Indifference would be simpler and would not require the machinery. They ask forgiveness of a deer. They flagellate over a felled tree. They maintain, by every inherited account, a rigorous and exhausting ethics of consumption toward every living thing in their domain — and none of it extends to a human being, ever, in any account we hold. inherited


Read against the replacement grievance this stops being a puzzle. Their moral community is the natural world: the thing they had, and still partly have. Man is not a member of it. Man is the category that took the position and is therefore outside the order entirely — not an evil to be resisted but a thing that does not qualify for consideration, in the way a stone does not. A fey asking a deer's pardon and then playing with a man for a season is not being inconsistent. It is applying its ethics correctly, by its own lights, and we are simply not in scope. contested


They do not want your body

This is the distinction that matters and the one that gets seekers killed, because the djinn bargain is better known and the two are assumed to work alike. They do not. ⚠ warning


A djinn takes the flesh in order to walk in the world, because it has no ground of its own. The fey never lost their ground. They hold the deep woods and whatever else man has not taken, and having a place already, they have no use for a body to be in the world with. contested


What they want is a plaything, and they want it in their own domain. The direction of the whole transaction is reversed: the djinn comes out, the fey take you in. Possession is rare in the accounts and appears to be regarded as crude. The characteristic outcome is a person removed — walked into the woods and kept there, bent to their entertainment on their ground, for as long as the interest lasts. inherited


The methods are the trick and the bargain, and both are common:

The trick
Made to whoever will accept it, structured so that a reasonable person accepts. Accounts stress that the terms are never technically false. The fey are described as fastidious about this in a way that reads as pride rather than restraint.
The bargain
Genuine, negotiated, and honoured. As with the djinn, the deal is not the trap. The trap is what a person is willing to agree to, and it is worth noticing that they bother negotiating at all — a thing that could simply take would not need your yes. contested


The duration is the part nobody warns about. There is no account in our possession of a fey tiring quickly. ⚠ warning


Competing accounts



How this entry was assembled
Drawn from: The existing entry, inherited from an unnamed hand. European oral material at many removes, mostly through collections assembled by people who thought they were preserving stories.
Compiled by: Gershon.
Known weaknesses: Nearly everything here descends from folklore collected in the nineteenth century by antiquarians with a project, and that filter is not removable. The ethics-exception reading is ours and rests on one inherited sentence. We have no firsthand account of a fey encounter at all — the account above is a reading, not a report.
Wanted: A firsthand account from anyone. Any account of a fey extending its moral order to a human being, which would break this entry and which we would rather have than be right.


See also

The fastidiousness about exact terms described above is followed up under City of London, which suggests the instrument may be older than the institutions now running on it.